NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
Ramsay v Leichhardt Council [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 477 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
Applicant; Colin James Ramsay PARTIES : Respondent: Leichhardt Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10256 of 2005
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- development on zone boundaries
DATES OF HEARING: 15/07/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/01/2005
Applicant: Mr J Strati, solicitor of Avendra Singh Strati &Kam LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Ms E Ranken, solicitor of Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
2 September 2005
10256 of 2005 Colin James Ramsay v Leichhardt Council [No 2]
JUDGMENT 1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal of a development application to add a residential floor to the existing office building on lot 31, s3, DP 1162, known as 310 Norton Street, Leichhardt.
2 On 5 August 2005 I published my findings, the main effect of which was to require a setback of 4.5m for the residential floor above the existing office building. The findings left it open to the applicant to file amended drawings that comply with the required setback. The applicant has indicated that it does not intend to file amended drawings. The parties have agreed to my making the orders dismissing the appeal in chambers.
Orders 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Development application to add a residential floor to the existing office building on lot 31, s3, DP 1162, known as 310 Norton Street, Leichhardt is determined by refusal. 3. The exhibits are returned.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate