NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Advanced Arbor Service Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 485
APPLICANT Advanced Arbor Service Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Strathfield Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 60010 of 2006
CORAM: Preston CJ
Appeal :- appeal against severity of sentence of Local Court - court cannot set aside conviction on appeal against sentence - appeal against conviction required
KEY ISSUES: Appeal:- appeal against conviction- conviction followed plea of guilty - no appeal as of right - leave to appeal required - application for leave to appeal time-barred
Environmental offences:- carrying out development without consent - removal of tree contrary to tree preservation order - offender professional arborist - environmental harm caused by loss of amenity and privacy - offence committed negligently - need for general deterrence for arborists - subjective mitigating circumstances - no prior convictions - prior good character - early plea of guilty - contrition and remorse - assistance to authorities - legal and economic consequences of conviction
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 76A(1)(a), s 125(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 3, s 10, s 11, s 12, s 31, s 32, s 33, s 34, s37, s 39 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 10, s 10(1)(a), s 21(3), s 21A(3), s 23
Active Tree Services Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 431 (9 August 2005); Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357; Budget Nursery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 42 A Crim R 81; Byron Shire Council v Fletcher (2005) 143 LGERA 155; Cameron v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 47 (13 February 2006); Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1992) 32 NSWLR 683; Carlino v Leichhardt Municipal Council (2005) 144 LGERA 235; Cliftleigh Haulage Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 692 (1 December 2005); Cooper v Coffs Harbour Council (1997) 97 LGERA 125; Ex parte Morrissey (1911) 11 SR (NSW) 550; ; Ex parte Day; Re Crampton (1943) 43 SR (NSW) 349; Gittany Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 242 (10 May 2006); CASES CITED: Holroyd City Council v Skyton Developments Pty Limited (2002) 119 LGERA 225; Keir v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 754 (7 December 2004); Mosman Municipal Council v Menai Excavations Pty Ltd (2002) 122 LGERA 89; R v Kent Justices [1936] 1 KB 54; R v Longshaw (1990) 20 NSWLR 554; R v Oliver (1980) 7 A Crim R 174; R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; R v Visconti (1982) 2 NSWLR 104; Ryde City Council v Calleija (1998) 99 LGERA 360; Sutherland Shire Council v Nustas [2004] NSWLEC 608 (3 November 2004); Sutherland Shire Council v Turner [2004] NSWLEC 774 (18 June 2004); Thornloe v Filipowski (2001) 52 NSWLR 60; Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate