NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Bugeja v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 700
FIRST APPLICANT Phillip Frank Bugeja
PARTIES : SECOND APPLICANT Gisella Angela Bugeja
RESPONDENT Hornsby Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10705 of 2006
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- For extension to dwelling house and pergola, removal of Norfolk Island Pine tree, impact on character of area, privacy to adjoining property, replacement canopy tree
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act s 97
DATES OF HEARING: 06/11/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/06/2006
APPLICANT Mr D Briggs, solicitor SOLICITORS DG Briggs & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Hudson, solicitor SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
6 November 2006
10705 of 2006 Phillip Frank and Gisella Angela Bugeja v Hornsby Shire Council
JUDGMENT This determination was given extemporaneously and it has been edited prior to publication 1 This judgment is for an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act against Hornsby Shire Council's refusal of a development application for a rear extension and pergola to the dwelling located at 27 Finlay Avenue, Beecroft. 2 The council refused the development application because it required the removal of two Norfolk Island Pine trees. A s 82A Review for an amended application that required the removal of only one of the Norfolk Island Pines was also determined and refused by the council.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate