NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hewitt v Valuer General [2004] NSWLEC 728 APPLICANT PARTIES : Robert James Hewitt RESPONDENT Valuer-General FILE NUMBER(S) : 31042 of 2004 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Valuation of Land :- Appropriate valuation methodology - whether market slow at base date Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 - Housing for Older People or People with a Disability Valuation of Land Act 1916 s 6A, s 40 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 16/12/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/24/2004
APPLICANT Mr R J Hewitt (in person) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Pickles instructed by the Crown Solicitor's Office
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
24 December 2004
31042 of 2004 Hewitt v Valuer General
JUDGMENT 1 Her Honour: The Applicant, Mr Hewitt, has commenced Class 3 proceedings challenging the Valuer General's assessment of the value of Lot 1 Folio Identifier 1048900 being 43-47 Clarke St, Peakhurst ("the land") pursuant to s 37(1) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 ("the Act"). The relevant base date for the present valuation appeal is 1 July 2003 at which date the Valuer General valued the unimproved value of the land at $1.72 million. This valuation was used by the Office of State Revenue to calculate the land tax payable by the Applicant for the 2004 tax year.
2 Mr Hewitt represented himself at the hearing and relied on the evidence of Mr Tseris, a valuer, who contends that the unimproved value of the land as at the base date was $1.38 million. The Valuer General was represented by his barrister, Mr Pickles. Mr Edmondson, a valuer, gave evidence on behalf of the Valuer General that the unimproved value of the land as at the base date was $1.92 million. If I accept Mr Edmondson's figure then the amount of $1,72 million determined by the Valuer General would remain as the unimproved value of the land as at 1 July 2003 and the land tax payable by the Applicant for the 2004 tax year will be assessed on the basis of this figure.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate