NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 124 LGERA 183
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Armstrong v Ashfield Municipal Council [2002] NSWLEC 237 APPLICANT L. Armstrong PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ashfield Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10133 of 2001 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights :- extent of existing use below surface of land LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4, s 106 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Ashfield Municipal Council v Leonard Armstrong & Christina Armstrong [2002] NSWCA 269; Eaton & Sons Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1972) 129 CLR 270; 25 LGRA 369; Lemworth Pty Limited v Liverpool City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 371; North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio and Electrical Pty Ltd and Ors (1989) 67 LGRA 344 (CCA); CASES CITED: Salvation Army v Newcastle City Council (2000) 107 LGERA 40; Scully v Leichhardt Council (1994) 85 LGERA 109 ; Shire of Perth v O'Keefe and Anor (1963) 110 CLR 529; Starray Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2002] NSWLEC 48; Steedman v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [No 1] (1991) 87 LGERA 26 ; The Council of the City of Parramatta v Brickworks Limited (1972-1973) 128 CLR 1 DATES OF HEARING: 5/12/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2003
APPLICANT Mr G Newport (Barrister)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate