NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Canterbury City Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2002] NSWLEC 161 APPLICANT Canterbury City Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales FILE NUMBER(S) : 30244 of 1998 and 30022 of 1999 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Compulsory Acquisition of Land :- compensation - valuation - market value - community land - comparable sales - statutory restrictions - discount - rental value LEGISLATION CITED: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 s 55 Local Government Act 1993 s 27, s 35, s 45, s 46 Ashfield Municipal Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (2001) 117 LGERA 203; Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Brighton v Road Construction Authority (1986) VR 255; Corrie and Anor v MacDermott (1914) AC 1056; Hornsby Shire Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (Bannon J, NSWLEC, 29 May 1996, unreported); CASES CITED: Hornsby Shire Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (1998) 100 LGERA 105; Hurstville City Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (1999) NSWLEC 100; Prince Alfred Park Reserve Trust v State Rail Authority of NSW (1997) 96 LGERA 75; Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Hurstville City Council (2001) 112 LGERA 223; Turner & Anor v Minister of Public Instruction (1956) 95 CLR 245 DATES OF HEARING: 04/03/2002; 05/03/2002; 06/03/2002; 14/06/2002 written submissions: 13/03/2002; 20/03/2002; 25/03/2002; DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/19/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate