NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Carantinos v Gosford City Council [2006] NSWLEC 353
APPLICANT Michael and Susan Carantinos PARTIES : RESPONDENT Gosford City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10750 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Residential subdivision, extent of access road construction, drainage, public interest
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Gosford Planning Scheme Ordinance Development Control Plan No. 112 - Residential Subdivision LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan No. 5 - Narara Fisheries Management Act 1994 - Section 205 Rivers & Foreshores Improvement Act 1948 Rural Fires Act
DATES OF HEARING: 07/02/2006, 29/03/2006, 08/05/2006, 16/05/2006 and 09/06/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/2006
APPLICANT Mr M Frazer, barrister SOLICITORS P J Donnellan & Company LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Gough, solicitor SOLICITORS Storey & Gough
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
21 June 2006
10750 of 2005 Michael and Susan Carantinos v Gosford City Council
JUDGMENT
Background 1 This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a 12 lot residential subdivision at No. 11 Monarchy Way, Narara. The reasons for refusal form the following issues for the appeal: + adequacy of proposed access road, + flood liability of part of the land, + retention of large Sydney Blue Gum trees, + drainage impacts on adjoining properties, + public interest.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate