NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Shaynd v Ku-ring-gai MC [2005] NSWLEC 360
APPLICANT Mark Shaynd
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11366 of 2004
CORAM: Hussey C
Development Application :- Dual Occupancy Development - Bushfire risk - Amenity - Public interests. KEY ISSUES:
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy 53 Planning for Bushfire Protection 2001
DATES OF HEARING: 28/04/2005, 10/05/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/10/2005
APPLICANT Mr T. Hones, solicitor of Hones Solicitors
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R. Graham, solicitor of Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
10 May 2005
11366 of 2004 Mark Shaynd v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT 1 The appeal arises out of council's refusal of a development application for the construction of two detached dual occupancy dwellings on land at No. 86 Kitchener Street, St Ives.
2 The subject land is a relatively large battleaxe shaped lot and under the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance, it is zoned residential 2(c) and dual occupancy development is prohibited. However, this site is subject to the provisions of SEPP 53 and because of its residential zoning, unless the land is with an area described as Schedule 3, a dual occupancy development is permitted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate