NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Carmody v Brancourts Nominees Pty Limited; Carmody v Brancourt [2002] NSWLEC 181 PROSECUTOR Stephen Carmody PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Brancourts Nominees Pty Limted Maurice Albert Brancourt FILE NUMBER(S) : 50057; 50058; 50059; 50060 of 2002 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- abuse of process - plea in bar - duplicity Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 125(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 33, s 110 LEGISLATION CITED: National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974 s 5, s 118D(1) Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Sch 1, Sch 2 Great Lakes Local Environmental Plan 1996 cl 10(2) Blockburger v United States (1932) 204 US 299; Connelly v DPP [1964] AC 1254; Dodd v Dodd (1991) 56 A Crim R 451; Elrington (1861) 1 B&S 688; Grady v Corbin (1990) 495 US 508; Hedberg v Woodhall (1912) 15 CLR 531; CASES CITED: Li Wan Quai v Christie (1906) 3 CLR 1125; Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; Power v Penthill House Pty Limited (1993) 80 LGERA 247; Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251; Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1; Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; Wemyss v Hopkins (1875)LR 10 QB 378 DATES OF HEARING: 07/10/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/11/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate