NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Thaikiwi Pty Ltd v Sydney CC [2005] NSWLEC 576
APPLICANT Thaikiwi Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10794 of 2005
CORAM: Hoffman C
Development Application :- refusal of a brothel in a heritage building with with a mixture of residential flats and professional and commercial units - suitability of the site - amenity - plan of management - public interest. KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Central Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Draft Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2005 Sex Services Development control Plan 2003
DATES OF HEARING: 5/10/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/05/2005
APPLICANT Mr Creighton, agent
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S. Kondilios, solicitor of Maddocks
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
5 October 2005
10794 of 2005 Thaikiwi Pty Limited v Sydney City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a Class 1 appeal, No. 10794 of 2005 between Thaikiwi Pty Limited and Sydney City Council in regard to the refusal of a brothel at Unit 10, Level 4 at No. 44 Bridge Street, Sydney. 2 The building is an Art Deco heritage listed building of eight-storeys. It has three strata units per floor in which there is a mix of residential flats and professional and commercial uses with a restaurant on the ground floor. There is a small entry lobby off Bridge Street with doors at the street and then another door with electronic security and intercom to each unit. Beyond the second door is a corridor to the single lift and to the fire stair and garbage room. Apparently the fire stair used to be unenclosed as a main stair shaft. The lift is relatively new but it gives a slow service speed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate