NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Property Council of Australia Limited & Ors v Direct Factory Outlets Homebush Pty Limited & Ors [2003] NSWLEC 99 APPLICANTS Property Council of Australia Limited & Ors PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Direct Factory Outlets Homebush Pty Limited & Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : 40871 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- motions seeking strike out of subpoenas - subpoenas covered large number of documents - whether subpoenas too wide - whether fishing - whether being used as replacement for discovery - whether irrelevant material sought - whether oppressive Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Pre-Hearing Practice Direction 1999 Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth) s 35 Arnhill Pty Ltd v General Terminal Company Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 545; Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Limited (2001) 105 FCR 136; Botany Bay Instrumentation & Control Pty Ltd v Stewart [1984] 3 NSWLR 98; CASES CITED: McIlveen v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd [2002] NSWLEC 137; Southern Pacific Hotel Services Inc v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 710; Spencer Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921; The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564; Woolworths Ltd v The Warehouse Group (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWLEC 55 DATES OF HEARING: 14, 19, 26/03/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/28/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate