NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Moodley T v Botany Bay City Council [2004] NSWLEC 183 APPLICANT Moodley T PARTIES : RESPONDENT Botany Bay City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11438 & 11440 of 2003 CORAM: Hussey C KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Application LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1976 CASES CITED: Tensat Chullora No. 2 Trust v Valuer-General (110 LGRA 227 p 233); Gee v Port Stephens Council [2003] NSWLEC 260 (17 October 2003 DATES OF HEARING: 16/04/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/21/2004
APPLICANT Mr T Moodley
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr T O'Connor, solicitor SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
11438 & 11440 of 2003 Hussey C 21 May 2004
T Moodley Applicant
v Botany Bay City Council Respondent Judgment
1. This costs application arises from the following two appeals, involving development of a site at 6 Ivy Street, Botany: - Appeal No. 11438/03; s 96 modification to an approved two-storey dwelling, on the rear portion of the site. - Appeal No. 11440/03; development application for the demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling on the front portion of the site.
2 . As the main issues in these initial appeals concerned access and privacy considerations in respect of both the new dwellings, the parties agreed that they be heard together at a s 34 conference. After hearing the respective cases, this resulted in the two appeals being upheld, subject to amended conditions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate