NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Revilla Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Sydney (No. 2) [2004] NSWLEC 529 APPLICANT: Revilla Pty Limited PARTIES : ACN 071 764 415
RESPONDENT: Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10537 of 2004 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- application to strike out issues - irrelevant issues struck out - application for approval for use of a building for place of public entertainment Interpretation Act 1987 s 35(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 68, s 89, s 94 Local Government (Approvals) Regulation 1999 cl 7 CASES CITED: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1985) 162 CLR 1; Revilla Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Sydney [2003] NSWLEC 343 DATES OF HEARING: 23/07/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/2004
APPLICANT: Mr A Hatzis (barrister) SOLICITORS: Thurlow Fisher Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A E Galasso (barrister) SOLICITORS: City Prosecutor's Office Council of the City of Sydney
JUDGMENT: - 7 - IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Lloyd J
Tuesday, 28 September 2004
LEC No. 10537 of 2004
REVILLA PTY LIMITED v THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SYDNEY [2004] NSWLEC 529
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate