NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 153 LGERA 136
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Chino Pty Limited v Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation and Anor [2006] NSWLEC 768
APPLICANT Chino Pty Limited PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation SECOND RESPONDENT Willoughby City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30242 of 2005; 30243 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Valuation of Land :- extinguishment of easement for support - does public purpose of acquisition include reinstatement of easement for support - whether before and after method of valuation should apply - whether s 88K Conveyancing Act 1919 should apply - whether matters after date of acquisition can be taken into account
Conveyancing Act 1919 s88K Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 s4, s19, s20, s31, s37, s54, s55, s56 LEGISLATION CITED: Public Works Act 1912 Real Property Act 1900 Transport Administration Act 1988 s18
Anderson v Valuer-General [2005] NSWLEC 151; Antipas v Kutcher (2006) 144 LGERA 289 ; Besmaw Pty Ltd v Sydney Water Corporation (2001) 113 LGERA 246; Blacktown City Council v Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 259 ; Brisbane City Council v Thorpe (1965) 12 LGRA 31; Broken Bay Peninsular Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (1997) NSWLEC 165 ; Commissioner of Highway v George Eblen Pty Limited (1975) 34 LGERA 207 ; Commissioner of Succession Duties (SA) v Executor Trustee and Agency Co of SA Ltd (1947) 74 CLR 358 ; Council of the City of Liverpool v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 46 FCR 67; D & C Dwight v Sydney Water Corporation Ltd [1995] NSWLEC 72 ; Gosford Shire Council v Green (1980) 48 LGRA 201; Harman v City and County of San Francisco (1972) 7 Cal. 3d 150 ; CASES CITED: Hemmerling v Tomlev Inc. (1967) 67 Cal. 2d 572; Hornsby Shire Council v Roads and Traffic Authority (1998) 100 LGERA 105 ; Housing Commission of NSW v Falconer [1981] 1 NSWLR 547; Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Limited v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWLEC 419; Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] 2 All ER 317 ; Redevelopment Agency of the City of Concord v Michael Tobriner ("Tobriner 1") (1984) 153 Cal. App. 3d 367; Redevelopment Agency of the City of Concord v Tobriner ("Tobriner 2") 215 Cal. App. 3d 1087; Roads and Traffic Authority v Perry [2001] 52 NSWLR 222; Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418; Sydney Water Corporation v Besmaw [2002] NSWCA 147; The People ex rel. Department of Public Works v Logan (1961) Cal. App. 2d 581; United States v Welch (1910) 217 US 333; William Henry Kater v Electricity Transmission Authority of New South Wales, (NSWLEC, Pearlman J, 9 February 1996, unreported)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate