NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sale v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 464
APPLICANT Phillip Sale PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10998 of 2004
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Costs Applications
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 28/10/2004 and 16/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/31/2005
APPLICANT Mr J Hannaford, solicitor SOLICITORS Hannaford Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Rigg, solicitor SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
31 August 2005
10998 of 2004 Phillip Sale v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT Background 1 These two costs applications relate to Development Application No. 600/04 ("the development application") and a subsequent application to amend the resultant development consent, which is for six dwellings in a medium density/seniors living development at 1 Tarook Avenue and 43 Canoon Road, Turramurra, comprising:
(a) Applicant's costs associated with the appeal against the deemed refusal of the development application; and (b) Respondent's and applicant's costs associated with the application to amend conditions attached to the development consent. 2 By way of background it is of relevance to note that the site has been the subject of two unsuccessful appeals to the Court for similar, more intensive development proposals (10505 of 2001 - eight dwellings and 10618 of 2003 - seven dwellings).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate