NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : McAuliffe v Sydney City Council [2006] NSWLEC 27
APPLICANT Chris McAuliffe PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11089 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Terrace house alterations - privacy screen - size and scale
DATES OF HEARING: 20/01/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 01/20/2006
APPLICANT Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS McKEES LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
20 January 2006
11089 of 2005 Chris McAuliffe v Sydney City Council
JUDGMENT This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 This appeal is against council's deemed refusal of a development application for alterations comprising dormer windows and balcony privacy screen, to an approved dwelling application of 56 Telopea Street, Redfern. The approved building works are currently being undertaken and the appeal was lodged against the refusal of the dormer windows in both the street elevation and rear elevation of the roof. However, at the hearing, the application for the front dormers was abandoned by the applicant, with the remaining unresolved matter concerning the impact of the rear north facing dormer windows in the roof of the third bedroom.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate