NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : (2003) 123 LGERA 312
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hynes Urban Planners Pty Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council [2003] NSWLEC 1 APPLICANT Hynes Urban Planners Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hawkesbury City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10093 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Designated Development :- whether proposed development constitutes designated development - test for designated development in light of changes to statutory scheme - test of characterisation is test to be applied - whether application is for subdivision Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 77A, s 78A Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1980 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 4(1), Sch 3 Pt 1, Sch 3 Pt 1 cl 29 Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 1989 cl 8, cl 13, cl 41AA Baulkham Hills Shire Council v O'Donnell (1990) 69 LGRA 404; Bob Blakemore Pty Ltd v Anson Bay Company (Australia) Pty Ltd (Priestly, Clarke and Meagher JJA, NSWCA, 23 March 1990, unreported); Canyonleigh Environment Protection Society Inc v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1997) 95 LGERA 294; CB Investments Pty Ltd v Colo Shire Council (1980) 41 LGRA 270; CIC Insurance Limited v Bankstown Football Club Limited (1997) 187 CLR 384; CASES CITED: Foodbarn Pty Ltd v Solicitor-General (1975) 32 LGRA 157; Logan-Bald Partnership v Byron Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 185; Lyne v Moree Plains Shire Council (1999) 110 LGERA 120; Maxwell v Hornsby Council (2002) 121 LGERA 186; Momentum Architects Pty Limited v Hornsby Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 192; Penrith City Council v Waste Management Authority (1990) 71 LGRA 376 DATES OF HEARING: 19/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/13/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate