NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mayer v Hurstville City Council [2006] NSWLEC 339
APPLICANT Katherine Mayer PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hurstville City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10956 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
Development Application - Existing Use Rights :- KEY ISSUES: Parking .
Hurstville Local Environment Plan 1994 County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordnance LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan 2, Car Parking Development Control Plan 6, Child Care Centres .
CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; .
DATES OF HEARING: 20 and 21 March 2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/21/2006
APPLICANT Mr P Clay, barrister INSTRUCTED BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: McKees Legal Solutions
RESPONDENT Mr P Rigg, solicitor Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Moore C
21 March 2006
10956 of 2005 Katherine Mayer v Hurstville City Council
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. The consequence of the Court's decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. These conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but are available for inspection at the Council. In addition, a copy the Court's Orders and the conditions may be obtained from the Court's registry upon payment of a fee. Details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions are available on the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate