NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Michael Stuart Architects P/L v Woollahra MC [2005] NSWLEC 732
APPLICANT Michael Stuart Architects Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Woollahra Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10630 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
Costs :- repair and alteration to a fence on a heritage listed property KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Development control Plan and Fencing Code
Gee v Port Stephens Council [2003]; CASES CITED: Aldi v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 338
DATES OF HEARING: 9/11/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/06/2005
APPLICANT Mr A. Abbott
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P. Rigg, solicitor of Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
6 December 2005
10630 of 2005 Michael Stuart Architects Pty Limited v Woollahra Municipal Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
COSTS JUDGMENT 1 This costs claim arises out of an appeal against the refusal of a development application for restorations and adaptation of a heritage listed front/side, sandstone boundary fence at 4 Sutherland Crescent, Darling Point.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate