NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tuffy v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 812
APPLICANT Richard Tuffy PARTIES :
RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10674 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Construction of boatshed, compliance with foreshore controls, excessive excavation, boatshed design
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2000 Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 11/12/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/11/2006
APPLICANT Mr G Newport, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Mathieson, solicitor Of: Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
11 December 2006
10674 of 2006 Richard Tuffy v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
Background 1 This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a development application for the construction of a boat shed and associated works on a foreshore property situated at 44 Coopernook Avenue, Gymea Bay.
2 The refusal was due mainly to the applications failure to satisfy the LEP provisions relating to impact on foreshore areas, particularly the proposal for significant excavation into the natural rock to construct the boat shed and associated retaining walls on the foreshore. The height of the boat shed, the amount of excavation along with the removal of the natural rock areas along the foreshore was considered excessive and inappropriate in terms of the built up appearance of the foreshore, loss of natural shoreline and the natural rock features of the site.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate