NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sharp v Swadling [2004] NSWLEC 241 APPLICANT PARTIES : Robyn Elizabeth Sharp RESPONDENTS Shand and Franca Swadling FILE NUMBER(S) : 30043 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- whether conduct of parties reasonable LEGISLATION CITED: Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 s 14 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 CASES CITED: Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 ; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs: Ex parte Lai Qin (1977) 186 CLR 622 DATES OF HEARING: 13/08/2003 EX TEMPORE 08/21/2003 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr A.M. Pickles (barrister) SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr E.C. Muston SOLICITOR
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 30043 of 2003
Pain J
21 August 2003 ROBYN SHARP Applicant v SHAND and FRANCA SWADLING Respondents Judgment
1. This decision concerns the question of who should get costs in proceedings brought under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (the Encroachment of Buildings Act), seeking an easement over land with a cross-claim for the removal of those encroachments when there has been no final determination of the matter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate