NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Young v Parrramatta City Council (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 662
APPLICANT PARTIES : Greg Young RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10322 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Whether development application can be amended to seek consent for deferred commencement - costs
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 10 r 1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s80(3) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 55
CASES CITED: Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70
DATES OF HEARING: 23/10/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/23/2006
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ian Woodward (solicitor) SOLICITORS Storey & Gough Solicitors
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
23 October 2006
10322 of 2006 Greg Young v Parramatta City Council (No 2)
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 Her Honour: These are Class 1 appeal proceedings in relation to development application 175/2006. I handed down a judgment on a preliminary question of law on 1 September 2006. The question of law was whether the Court had power to approve an application for subdivision of land where the land was the subject of a development consent granted by the Court in 2004 pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 – Housing for Older People with a Disability ("SEPP 5"), and the 2004 development consent had not yet been carried out. I held that the Court had no jurisdiction to consider the applicant's development application for subdivision because of cl 18 of SEPP 5. The Council has been represented by its solicitor and the Applicant has represented himself throughout.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate