NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Pardoe and Ors [2004] NSWLEC 308 APPLICANT: Williams PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Pardoe and Ors. FILE NUMBER(S) : 40626 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 4 proceedings-interlocutory hearing for interlocutory injunction-interlocutory injunction refused-subsequently final hearing concluded and judgment reserved. LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act, s 69(2) CASES CITED: Williams v Pardoe [2003] NSWLEC 363; Williams v Pardoe and Ors [2003] NSWLEC 150 DATES OF HEARING: 04/02/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/2004
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack (Agent) SOLICITORS N/A
1ST-3RD RESPONDENTS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr N Williams SC FOURTH RESPONDENT N/A
SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 40626 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Bignold J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 21 June 2004
NEVILLE WILLIAMS
Applicant
v
COLIN PARDOE
First Respondent
BARRICK AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Second Respondent
BARRICK GOLD OF AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. By Notice of Motion, the first, second and third Respondents seek an order for costs against the Applicant in respect of the hearing of the Applicant's claim for an interlocutory injunction in class 4 proceedings alleging breaches of conditions of Permit No 1468 granted by the Director-General pursuant to the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, s 87 (NP&W Act). The Applicant resists any costs order.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate