NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Satmell Holdings Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 267
APPLICANT Satmell Holdings Pty Ltd
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Holroyd City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11135 of 2004
CORAM: Hussey C
Development Application :- Industrial warehouse - BCA fire access - traffic - amenity impacts KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991 LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan No. 1 Development Control Plan No. 3 Georges River Original Environmental Plan
DATES OF HEARING: 08/03/2005, 20/05/2005 and 25/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/25/2005
APPLICANT Mr J Bingham, solicitor SOLICITORS Deacons LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Reilly, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
25 May 2005
11135 of 2004 Satmell Holdings Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council
JUDGMENT Background 1 This appeal arises from council's refusal of a development application for the erection of an industrial warehouse and associated office at 219 - 225 Woodpark Road, Smithfield. It was refused for a number of reasons, from which the following issues were identified for the appeal. The issues were subsequently amended and are summarised as follows: * Fire safety, in terms of compliance with the BCA requirements for building of the proposed bulk and size; * Traffic/access, including manoeuvring area for large articulated vehicles; * Amenity impacts, including those raised by the neighbours 2 With regard to the traffic/access issue, the parties agreed to Mr C Hallam being appointed as the Court-appointed expert and he prepared a detailed report, resulting in the parties accepting his recommendations for conditional consent, which resolved this issue.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate