NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
Attard & Anor v Canal & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 222 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANTS: Frank Attard and Sylvia Attard PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Luigino Antonio Canal and Guiseppina Maria Canal
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31227 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
Encroachment :- exercise of discretion under Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 s 3(3) KEY ISSUES:
Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 s 2, s 3, s 4 Miscellaneous Acts (Rating and Valuation) Amendment Act 1981 LEGISLATION CITED: Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001 Valuation of Land Act 1916 s 6A
Boland v Yates Property Corp Pty Ltd (1999) 74 ALJR 209; Bronzel v State Planning Authority of SA (1979) 21 SASR 513; CASES CITED: Mark Dawkins v A R M Holdings Pty Limited (Pearlman J, NSWLEC, 14 April 1994, unreported); Morris v Thomas (1991) 73 LGRA 164; Vaughan v Byron Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 321
02/05/2005 DATES OF HEARING: 03/05/2005 04/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/2005
APPLICANTS: Mr A Pickles (barrister) SOLICITORS: Robilliard & Robilliard LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS: Mr A Thompson (barrister) SOLICITORS: G Cerin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate