NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : North Sydney Council v O'Hara (Costs) [2003] NSWLEC 280 APPLICANT North Sydney Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Louise O'Hara FILE NUMBER(S) : 40119 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- whether disentitling conduct by successful party LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Director-General of the Department of Land and Water Conservation v Ramke [1999] NSWLEC 22, unreported; Jzavellos v Canterbury City Council (1999) 105 LGERA 262; CASES CITED: Mantel v Anstee and Anor [2001] NSWLEC 202, unreported; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Scott v Gosford City Council [2001] NSWLEC 282, unreported DATES OF HEARING: 22/04/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/19/2003
APPLICANT Mr D Parry (Barrister) SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
RESPONDENT In Person
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 40119 of 1999
Talbot J
19 November 2003 North Sydney Council Applicant v Louise O'Hara Respondent Judgment
Introduction 1 Following a lengthy history of this matter dating back to 1996, which is detailed in earlier judgments, the applicant is now seeking an order set out in an amended notice of motion dated 20 November 2002 that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings, including costs of applications made and notices of motion filed in the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate