NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Holroyd City Council v El Baysari SM & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 179
PROSECUTOR Holroyd City Council
PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Samia - Marie El-Baysari Al - Badoui El-Baysari
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50064 of 2004; 50065 of 2004
CORAM: Talbot J
Prosecution :- test for proof by circumstantial evidence. Planning instruments:- construction of tree preservation order - severance. KEY ISSUES: Construction and interpretation - effect of tree preservation order. Evidence:- circumstantial evidence.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 26, s 26(1)(e), s 26(1)(f), s 125, s 125(1), LEGISLATION CITED: Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991 cl 18
Beckwith v The Queen (1976) 135 CLR 569; Cameron v Lake Macquarie City Council (2000) 107 LGERA 308; Giles v Dodds [1947] VLR 465; Hornsby Shire Council v Winsloe (1998) 101 LGERA 117 ; CASES CITED: Hornsby Shire Council v Denise ("Densey") Clyne Matter No. 50040 of 1998 Land and Environment Court 29 October 1998, unreported ; Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 ; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 ; R v Adams (1935) 53 CLR 563
DATES OF HEARING: 21/03/2005, 22/03/2005, 23/03/2005, 04/04/2005, 05/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/19/2005
PROSECUTOR Miss J M Jagot (Barrister) SOLICITORS McKees LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate