NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Carriage v Stockland Development Pty Limited (No 5) [2004] NSWLEC 674 APPLICANT Allan Richard Carriage
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Stockland Development Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation FILE NUMBER(S) : 40187 of 2004 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Administrative Law :- application to reopen hearing following judgment LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, Pt 1 r 6, Pt 15 r 9 Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155; Autodesk Inc and Anor v Dyason and Ors (No. 2) (1992-1993) 176 CLR 300; CASES CITED: Carriage v Stockland Development Pty Limited (No 4) [2004] NSWLEC 553; Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992-1993) 176 CLR 256; Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471; Wollong Pty Limited v Shoalhaven City Council (No.2) (2002) 122 LGERA 178 DATES OF HEARING: 26/11/2004 EX TEMPORE 11/26/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr A. McAvoy (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Shaw Reynolds Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIRST RESPONDENT Mr P. Clay (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Baker & McKenzie
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate