NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 LGERA 253
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Dixon & Anor v Burwood Council [2002] NSWLEC 190 APPLICANTS Tammy Dixon and Tamara Alexandrovna Doong PARTIES : RESPONDENT Burwood Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10657 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- s 56A appeal - brothel development - whether Commissioner erred in law - whether questions of law raised or errors of fact - whether non-physical aspects of amenity are relevant - whether the atmosphere of the neighbourhood is relevant to social impact - whether the moral and sexual standards of a church community are relevant - whether the modification of behaviour of members of the church community were relevant to social impact where there was no need to be concerned about personal safety - error of law - whether decision vitiated LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C Attorney General (New South Wales) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139; Bauer Holdings Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1981) 48 LGRA 365; Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1993) 79 LGERA 367; Broad v Brisbane City Council (1986) 59 LGRA 296; Carstens v Pittwater Council (1999) 111 LGERA 1; Croucher v Fairfield City Council (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 2 July 1997, unreported); CASES CITED: Fairfield City Council v Liu Lonza & Beauty Holdings (Mason P and Dunford AJA, NSWCA, 17 February 1997, unreported); Guideline Drafting and Design v Marrickville Municipal Council (1988) 64 LGRA 275; K Richardson & Associates Pty Ltd v Yarrowlumla Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 8; McPhee v S Bennett Ltd (1935) 52 WN (NSW) 8; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611; Novak v Woodville City Council (1990) 70 LGERA 233; Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Municipal Council (2000) 110 LGERA 345; Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council (No 2) (2001) 113 LGERA 301; Venus Enterprises Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (1981) 43 LGRA 67 DATES OF HEARING: 13/08/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/31/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate