NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : EPA v Thaler [2005] NSWLEC 109
APPLICANT Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : RESPONDENT Andrew Evan Thaler
FILE NUMBER(S) : (4)0261 of 2002
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- penalty.
LEGISLATION CITED: Fines Act 1996.
DATES OF HEARING: 21/2/05, 22/2/05 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/22/2005
APPLICANT Ms J M Jagot (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R G Thomas (Barrister) SOLICITORS Bates & Associates
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Talbot J
22 February 2005
(4)0261 of 2002 Environment Protection Authority v Andrew Evan Thaler
JUDGMENT 1 Talbot J: Andrew Thaler ("the respondent") is charged with contempt of Court for having failed to comply with orders made by Cowdroy J on 16 August 2002. The circumstances are set out in a statement of charge which was served in accordance with the rules.
2 Finally with the benefit of counsel and solicitor, the respondent has appeared at this hearing. At the commencement of the actual hearing, with the leave of the Court, he changed his plea from a plea of not guilty to guilty. The plea of guilty amounts to an admission of the essential elements of the charge and the facts supporting it.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate