NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Slack-Smith and Another v Director-General of the Department of Land and Water Conservation [2003] NSWLEC 189 APPLICANTS Ross Slack-Smith PARTIES : Genise Janet Slack-Smith
RESPONDENT Director-General of the Department of Land and Water Conservation FILE NUMBER(S) : 40856 of 2002 CORAM: Talbot J Judicial Review :- failure to afford procedural fairness KEY ISSUES: natural justice where appeal allowed - Wednesbury unreasonableness - test of satisfaction or jurisdictional fact - whether estoppel against requirement for development consent - severance of invalid conditions Estoppel :- cannot prevent exercise of statutory discretion - cannot waive requirement for approval - advice that consent not required cannot raise estoppel Interpretation Act 1987 s 9 Local Government Act 1919 s 317B(5) National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 s 4, s 21(2), 21(2)(a), s 47, s 47 (1), s 47(1)(a), s 47(2), s 48, s 48(1), s 48(2), s 68, LEGISLATION CITED: Noxious Weeds Act 1993 Rural Fires Act 1997 Rural Lands Protection Act 1998 Western Lands Act 1901 s 18DB Western Lands Regulation 1997 s 29, Sch 4 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Brickworks Limited v The Council of the Shire of Warringah (1963) 108 CLR 568; Cann's Proprietary Limited v The Commonwealth and Another (1946) 71 CLR 210; Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission and Another (2000) 199 CLR 135; Cox & Hazel Pty Ltd v Gidney [1981] 1 NSWLR 468; Ex parte Hernes Estates Pty Ltd; Greater Wollongong City Council and Another (1967) 14 LGRA 102 at 108; Julius v Oxford (Bishop) 49 LJ QB 585; 5 App Cas 235; CASES CITED: King Gee Clothing Company Proprietary Limited and Others v The Commonwealth and Another (1945) 71 CLR 184; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Another v Peko-Wallsend Limited and Others (1985-1986) 162 CLR 24; Mison and Others v Randwick Municipal Council and Others (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife and Ors [2001] NSWCA 17, unreported; R v East Sussex County Council; Ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd [2002] 4 All ER 58; The Council of the City of Parramatta v Pestell (1972) 128 CLR 305; The Melbourne Steamship Company Limited v Moorehead (1912) 15 CLR 333 Pyneboard Pty Ltd and Others v Trade Practices Commission and Bannerman (1982) 39 ALR 565; Thompson and Others v The Council of the Municipality of Randwick (1950) 81 CLR 87 at 105-6; Twist v The Council of the Municipality of Randwick (1976) 136 CLR 106; Wyong Shire Council v Associated Minerals Consolidated Ltd and Another [1972] 1 NSWLR 114 DATES OF HEARING: 09/07/2003, 10/07/2003, 11/07/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/22/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate