NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cherrybrook Victory Christian Church (No 2) v Hornsby Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 161
Applicant: Cherrybrook Victory Christian Church PARTIES : Respondent: Hornsby Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11102 of 2003
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- SEPP 5 development
DATES OF HEARING: 11/04/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/11/2005
Applicant: Mr G McKee, solicitor of McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr P Jackson, solicitor of Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: - 1 - THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
11 April 2005
11102 of 2003 Cherrybrook Victory Christian Church v Hornsby Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 Senior Commissioner: I upheld the appeal on 21 May 2004. On 13 August 2004 Pain J heard an appeal under s56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 against my decision. On 5 November 2004, she set my orders aside and remitted the matter to me, on the basis that the application lacked certain details and that consequently I did not have the power to uphold the appeal. 2 In the intervening time the applicant has provided the required details and it is now common ground between the parties that those details are sufficient to determine the matter. I therefore make the following orders:
Orders 1. The appeal is upheld.
2. Development application to subdivide lot A DP 335625, known as 125 new Line Road, Cherrybrook, into two allotments, to demolish three existing buildings on the proposed rear allotment, and to erect a development for older people and people with disability consisting of eleven dwellings on the proposed rear allotment is determined by the granting of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate