NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mirvac Projects Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2003] NSWLEC 219 Applicant: Mirvac Projects Pty Limited PARTIES : Respondent: Council of the City of Sydney FILE NUMBER(S) : 10380 of 2003 CORAM: Moore C KEY ISSUES: Development Consent - Planning Instruments - Subdivision :- Appropriateness of condition requiring s88B instrument Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Central Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1996 Central Sydney Development Control Plan 1996 Fortunate Investments v North Sydney Council [2001] 114 LGERA 1; Goldin & Anor v Minister for Transport Administering the Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 [2002] NSWLEC 75; Hutchison 3G Australia Pty Limited v Waverley Council [2002] NSWLEC 151 ; CASES CITED: Shaddock v Parramatta City Council (No 1) 150 CLR 225; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; J James and Anastasia Markakis v Mosman Municipal Council [1998] NSWLEC 223; Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2001] WASCA 199 DATES OF HEARING: 16 September 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/31/2003
Ms S Duggan, barrister instructed by Coudert Bros LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr J Robson, barrister instructed by Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate