NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Saman Rahmani v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 481 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Saman Rahmani RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10388, 10391 and 10392 of 2004 CORAM: Watts C at 1 KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Easement under s 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 - RoW conditions - Solar access - Privacy - Private open space - Liquidambar and landscaping - Passing bay - Streetscape - Separation between Dwellings A and B and· Quality and quantity of solar access to Dwelling A's private open space. LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance, (KPSO) - State Environmental Planning Policy No 53 - Metropolitan Residential Development, (SEPP53) - State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55-Site remediation, (SEPP55) - Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 20 Hawkesbury Nepean River (No 2 - 1997), (SREP20) - Development Control Plan 43, (DCP43) - Development Control Plan 40?Waste management, (DCP40) - Dual Occupancy Development Control Code 2/2003, (Code) - Ku-ring-gai Notification Policy, (Policy) - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss79C and 97 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 26/08/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/26/2004
APPLICANT: Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS: McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P R Rigg, solicitor SOLICITORS: Deacons
JUDGMENT: Appeal No: 10388, 10391 and 10392 of 2004 24
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate