NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Easton v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 534
APPLICANT Mark Easton PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10671 of 2005
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Development application, impact on foreshore, SEPP 1 objection for height control, bulk of dwelling, location on site, foreshore vegetation
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2000 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1
CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167
DATES OF HEARING: 05/12/2005, 06/02/2006 and 10/02/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/10/2006
APPLICANT Mr P Clay, barrister SOLICITORS Michael Flaherty LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Berveling, barrister Instructed by: Mr C Mathieson and Mr A Markham, solicitors of: Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
10 February 2006
10671 of 2005 Mark Easton v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT This determination was given extemporaneously and it has been edited prior to publication 1 This is an extempore judgment for an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act against Sutherland Shire Council's refusal of a development application for a dwelling house at the property known as No.5-7 Griffin Parade, Illawong.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate