NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Voorderhake Partnership Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Council [2003] NSWLEC 12 APPLICANT Voorderhake Partnership Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-Ring-Gai Council FILE NUMBER(S) : (1)0135 of 2002 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Costs - Practice and Procedure :- planning and building appeal - new issue raised by respondent determinative of proceedings - application for costs by unsuccessful party Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Land and Environment Court Practice Direction 1993 par 10 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5 Bentley & Ors v Drummoyne Council & Ors [No 2] [1999] NSWLEC 103; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Maule v Liporoni (No 2) (2002) 122 LGERA 216; CASES CITED: Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2001) 51 NSWLR 673; Misra v Campbelltown City Council No. 2 [Costs] [2002] NSWLEC 63; Ohn v Walton (1995) 36 NSWLR 77; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Over Our Dead Body Society Inc. v Byron Bay Community Association Inc [2002] NSWLEC 99 DATES OF HEARING: 23/01/03 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/20/2003
APPLICANT Ms C Schofield (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J Smith (Solicitor)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate