NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 277 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT Truegain Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50121 of 2002 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- whether special costs order justified following plea of guilty and conviction Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 3, s 253, s 253(1), s 253(2), s 253(2)(b) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 52 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 52, Pt 52A Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 16 CASES CITED: Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 DATES OF HEARING: 27/10/2003, 28/10/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/19/2003
PROSECUTOR Mr D J Galpin (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr I J Hemmings (Barrister) SOLICITORS Corrs Westgarth Chambers
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 50121 of 2002
Talbot J
19 November 2003 Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Truegain Pty Limited Defendant Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate