NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : PDP (Darlinghurst Apartments) Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 41
APPLICANT PDP (Darlinghurst Apartments) Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT City of Sydney Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10755 of 2004
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- principle for applying opinion expressed by Court Appointed Expert - application of terms of DCP not prescriptive - condition requiring restrictive covenant rejected - criticism of the standard of presentation of draft conditions of consent by the parties
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A, s 81A(1), s 96 South Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1998 LEGISLATION CITED: South Sydney Development Control Plan South Sydney (Heritage Conservation) Development Control Plan 1998.
DATES OF HEARING: 7/12/2004, 8/12/2004, 9/12/2004, 17/12/2004 (written submissions), 22/12/2004 (written submissions)
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/10/2005
APPLICANT Mr M G Craig QC SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jacques LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr A E Galasso (Barrister) SOLICITORS Maddocks
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Talbot J
10 February 2005
10755 of 2004 PDP (Darlinghurst Apartments) Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council
JUDGMENT 1 Talbot J: This appeal is in respect of the respondent Council's refusal of a development application, which proposes the redevelopment and expansion of the former telephone exchange site, situated at 320 Liverpool Street, Darlinghurst for a mixed-use development.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate