NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Woodhouse v Wyong Shire Council & Others (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 83
APPLICANT Harvey Wooodhouse PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Wyong Shire Council SECOND RESPONDENTS Michael Schembri and Mary Jane Schembri
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10145 of 2005
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- development application for poulty farm - designated development - modified application - whether renotification required - whether environmental effects of modified application satisfactory - conditions regulating use of poultry farm
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79(6), s 98
CASES CITED: Transport Action Group Against Motorways Inc v Roads and Traffic Authority and Anor (1999) 46 NSWLR 598; Woodhouse v Wyong Shire Council & Ors [2005] NSWLEC 709
DATES OF HEARING: 21/02/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/24/2006
APPLICANT J Reid (solicitor) Pike Pike & Fenwick FIRST RESPONDENT J Reilly/K Gerathy/L Finn (solicitors) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Abbott Tout SECOND RESPONDENTS C McEwen SC SOLICITORS Staunton Beattie
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Cowdroy J
24 February 2006
10145 of 2005
HARVEY WOODHOUSE Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate