NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 119 LGERA 409
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Rail Infrastructure Corporation [2002] NSWLEC 37 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT Rail Infrastructure Corporation FILE NUMBER(S) : 50103; 50104; 50105 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- cause waters to be polluted - mitigation Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 120, s 120(1), s 120(2), s 241(1), s 241(1)(a), s 241(1)(b), s 241(1)(c) LEGISLATION CITED: Rail Safety Act 1993 Transport Administration Act 1998' Land and Environment Court Regulation 2000 CASES CITED: Thorneloe v Filipowski (2001) 116 LGERA 56 DATES OF HEARING: 04/03/2002; 05/03/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/22/2002
PROSECUTOR Mr T G Howard (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr B J Preston SC SOLICITORS Baker & McKenzie
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50103-5 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 22 March 2002
Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Rail Infrastructure Corporation Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The charges
1. The defendant has entered a plea of guilty to each of three charges that it committed an offence against s 120(2) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ("the PEO Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate