NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWLEC 20
APPLICANT Anthony Maurici
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30199A of 1999
CORAM: Nott C
Valuation of Land :- "Land value" of a waterfront residential property at Woolwich - methods of valuation - scarcity factor - improvements increment - movement in the market - effect of a development consent on land value - adjustments for size and other features of the comparable sales - weighing sales according to reliability. KEY ISSUES:
Land Tax Management Act 1956 LEGISLATION CITED: Taxation Administration Act 1966 Valuation of Land Act 1916
AMP Henderson Global Investors Ltd v Valuer-General [2004] NSWCA 19; (2004) 134 LGERA 426; Barmuncol Pty Ltd v Maroochy Shire Council (1983) LGRA 309 Daadine Pastoral Co Proprietary Ltd v Commissioner of Land Tax (1943) 7 The Valuer 299 at 304; Duffy v Minister for Planning [2003] WASCA 294 (2003) 129; LGERA 271; Eaton & Sons Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1972) 129 CLR 270 at 293; Federal Commissioner of Land Tax v Duncan (1915) 19 CLR 551; Flack v Valuer-General (1952) 18 LGR (NSW) 157 at 158; Guideline Drafting and Design v Marrickville Municipal Council (1988) 64 LGRA 275; Illawarra Meat (Developments) Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (Rath J 10 March 1978); MLC Properties Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [1999] NSWLEC 300 at [21] and [38]; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [1999] NSWLEC 299 (Nott C); Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [1999] NSWLEC 282; (1999) 105 LGERA 318 (Cowdroy J); CASES CITED: Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2001] NSWCA 78; (2001) 51 NSWLR 673; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] HCA 8; (2003) 212 CLR 111; McCathie v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1944] HCA 9 (1944) 69 CLR 1 at 15; Nap Nap Station Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (1969) 72 LGRA 293; Nock v Minister for Capital Territory (1982) 48 LGRA 293; Parramatta City Council v Shell Co. of Australia Ltd [1972] 2 NSWLR 632 at 637; Rodgers v Value-General No. 30457 of 1991, 7 November 1991; Royal Sydney Golf Club v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1955) 91 CLR 610; Strongsville Board of Education and City of Strongsville v Auditor and Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County and Hewlett Packard Co (Nos 1996-N-595 & 596, Ohio Board of Tax Appeals, 30 July 1999); Tetzner v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd [1958] AC 50; Torpey Vander Have Pty Ltd v Mass Constructions Pty (2002) 55 IPR 542, [2002] NSWCA 263 at [13]-[18]; Valuer-General v Fenton Nominees Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 160; Venti Seven Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2000] NSWLEC 285 at [4]-[6].
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate