NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Spurbest Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2002] NSWLEC 34 APPLICANT Spurbest Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10765 of 2001 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- requirements of local environmental plan - whether 'development' includes subdivision of land Central Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Central Sydney Heritage Local Environmental Plan 2000 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 4, s 4B and s 26(1) Interpretation Act 1987, s 11 Commonwealth of Australia v Randwick City Council [2001] NSWLEC 79; CASES CITED: Kingston & Anor v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404; Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (No. 3) [2001] NSWLEC 240 DATES OF HEARING: 11/02/02, 12/02/02, 13/02/02 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/28/2002
APPLICANT Mr D Officer QC
SOLICITORS Thorntons Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Craig QC
SOLICITORS PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10765 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 28/03/2002
Spurbest Pty Limited Applicant v Sydney City Council Respondent JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate