NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Webb (Graeme and Pamela) v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 80
APPLICANTS Graeme Webb and Pamela Dawn Webb
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11018 of 2004
CORAM: Nott C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Subdivision :- proposed subdivision of 2.011 ha into two lots - development standard of 2 ha - whether an objection under SEPP 1 should be upheld - consistency with the objectives of the zone - whether an unacceptable precedent will be created
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97
Alcorn v Baulkham Hills Shire Council, 10290 of 2003, decided on 4 September 2003; Bennett Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council [1988] NSWLEC 77; BP Australia Ltd v Campbelltown City Council (1994) 83 LGERA 274 (CA) ; Design 23 Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 125 LGERA 380; Goldin v Minister for Transport (2002) 121 LGERA 101; Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Heaven's Door Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 59; CASES CITED: Legal & General Life of Australia Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1990) 69 LGRA 201 (CA); North Sydney Municipal Council v Parlby (10617/85, 13 November 1986, unreported); Schulz Nursery Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 98; Seraphina Bell Pty Ltd v Willoughby Municipal Council (19676) 69 SR (NSW) 344 (FC); Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472; Willoughby Municipal Council v Huxley Homes Pty Ltd [1989] NSWLEC 135
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate