NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 104 APPLICANT Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11137 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- telecommunications facility - appeal upheld - health impacts from electromagnetic radiation - whether court should impose higher standard than Commonwealth telecommunications regime Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan 1991 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 Local Government Act 1993 Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 LEGISLATION CITED: Radiocommunications Act 1992 (Cth) Radiocommunications (Apparatus Licence) Determination 2003 Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Carstens v Pittwater Council (1999) 111 LGERA 1; James and Anastasia Markakis v Mosman Municipal Council [1998] NSWLEC 223 (18 September 1998); CASES CITED: Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] A.C. 578; [1980] All ER 731; Optus Communications Pty Limited v the Corporation of the City of Kensington and Norwood and Ors [1998] SARDC 480 (29 May 1998); R Hyett v Shire of Corangamite [1999] VCAT 794 (30 April 1999) DATES OF HEARING: 16/02/04, 17/02/04, 18/02/04, 19/02/04 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/26/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate