NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Formston v Pittwater Council [2004] NSWLEC 50 APPLICANTS Katie Formston, Helen Kaminski, John MacRae and Pat MacRae PARTIES : RESPONDENT Pittwater Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10319 of 2004 CORAM: Nott C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Subdivision of steep land into four lots - size of lots - subject to slip - means of vehicular access - pedestrian access via an inclinator - removal of trees - visual impact - bushfire threat - threatened species LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 3-7 November 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/23/2004
APPLICANTS Mr C J Leggat, barrister SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESONDENT Ms H P Irish, barrister SOLICITORS Malleson Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10319 of 2003 Nott C 23 February 2004
Katie Formston, Helen Kaminski, John MacRae and Pat MacRae Applicants v Pittwater Council Respondent
Reasons for Judgment
Overview
1 . In this appeal, the applicants seek consent for an amended development application comprising: (1) a four-lot subdivision of a steep parcel of land presently containing three lots at Nos 29, 31 and 33 Bakers Road, Church Point; (2) the erection of a house on new lot 4 (to be known as No 29A); (3) the provision of three double garages and a visitor carparking space in what might be called a carparking court towards the lower level of the subject land; and (4) the construction of a long inclinator (with its waiting stations or platforms) and a stairway , to give pedestrian access from the carparking court to three of the proposed lots on the higher part of the subject land. 2 . An earlier version of the development application had been recommended for refusal by a council town planner and by the council's development unit. The council's environment and planning committee resolved to refuse the application on 1 September 2003.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate