NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Zekic v Marrickville Council and Ors. [2005] NSWLEC 273
APPLICANT: Zekic
PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Marrickville Council and Ors.
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40023 of 2005
CORAM: Bignold J
Costs :- Class 4 proceedings-discontinued without consent-whether circumstances to exclude the presumptive entitlement to a costs order in favour of party discontinued against. KEY ISSUES:
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Part 11 r 5 of the Rules of Court
Gormick Constructions Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2002) 123LGERA 42; Joannou v Randwick City Council (1998) 105 LGERA 237; CASES CITED: Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Exparte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622
DATES OF HEARING: 12/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/06/2005
APPLICANT: In person
SOLICITORS N/A
1ST RESPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr Christmas, Solicitor SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr J Hones, Solicitor
SOLICITORS FIRST RESPONDENT: Principal Solicitor Marrickville Council SECOND RESPONDENT: Hones Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate