NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Newcastle City Council v Pace Farm Egg Products Pty Limited [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 241
PROSECUTOR: Newcastle City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Pace Farm Egg Products Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50071 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
Prosecution :- whether defendant placed pollutant in a position where it did or was likely to fall or descend into waters - whether rational inferences consistent with innocence open on the evidence KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- application of Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 257
Clean Waters Act 1970 s 16 LEGISLATION CITED: Marine Pollution Act 1987 s 8 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 120, s 257
Chamberlain & Anor v The Queen [No 2] (1984) 153 CLR 521; Environment Protection Authority v Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation Ltd (1994) 83 LGERA 51; Filipowski v Nikolaos; Pontian Shipping Co Limited [2005] NSWLEC 102; Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; CASES CITED: Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 36; Mathews v Goulburn Wool Processors (Smart J, NSWSC, 6 November 1986, unreported); New South Wales Sugar Milling Co-operative Ltd v State Pollution Control Commission (1991) 73 LGRA 86; Shepherd v R (1990) 170 CLR 573; State Pollution Control Commission v Blayney Abattoirs Pty Ltd (1991) 72 LGRA 221
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate