NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Woodhouse v Wyong Shire Council & Others [2005] NSWLEC 709
APPLICANT Harvey Woodhouse FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Wyong Shire Council SECOND RESPONDENTS Michael and Mary Jane Schembri
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10145 of 2005
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- poultry farm - conflicting expert evidence relating to odour - staged validation approach - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act s 80A(4) - noise - subdivision - undersized lot - objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 5(a), s 80A(4), s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Pt 1 of Sch 3, cl 21(4) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 8 (Central Coast Plateau Areas) Wyong Local Environmental Plan 1991 cl 10(3), cl 14(2)(b)
Gillespies v Warringah Council (2002) 124 LGERA 147; Mackenzie v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 131 ; Mison and Others v Randwick Municipal Council and Others (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 ; CASES CITED: Scott and Others v Wollongong City Council and Another (1992) 75 LGRA 112 ; Winn v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife and Others (2001) 130 LGERA 508 ; Winten Property Group Limited v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 46
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate