NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Director General National Parks and Wildlife Services and Ors. [2003] NSWLEC 252 APPLICANT: Williams PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Director General National Parks and Wildlife Services and Ors. FILE NUMBER(S) : (4)0171 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: Fay v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (1990) 20NSWLR 665 DATES OF HEARING: 05/06/2002 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/05/2002
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack, Agent SOLICITORS N/A
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr M Fraser, Barrister 2ND & 4TH RESPONDENTS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr N J Williams SC 3RD RESPONDENT Mr C Ireland, Solicitor
SOLICITORS FIRST RESPONDENT National Parks and Wildlife Service 2ND-4TH RESPONDENTS Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 0171 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 5 June 2002
N. WILLIAMS
Applicant
v
DIRECTOR GENERAL NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
First Respondent
BARRICK GOLD AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 008 143 137
Second Respondent
HOMESTAKE AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 007 857 598
Third Respondent
COLIN PARDOE
Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
1. This is a Motion filed earlier today which has been made returnable before me at noon seeking an interlocutory injunction against the second, third and fourth Respondents, restraining them from carrying out activity in reliance upon a permit granted under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, s 87.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate