NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Oatley v Manly C [2004] NSWLEC 290 APPLICANT S D & M E Oatley PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly C FILE NUMBER(S) : 10122 of 2004 CORAM: Hussey C Building Application :- building alterations - overlooking KEY ISSUES: aural and visual amenity impacts
LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 11/05/04, 01/06/04 EX TEMPORE 06/01/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Ms H Irish, barrister SOLICITORS Whitehead Cooper Williams
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr W O'Rourke, solicitor SOLCITORS Deacons Graham and James
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10122 of 2004 Hussey C 1 June 2004 Stephen Donald and Megan Elizabeth Oatley Applicant
v Manly Council Respondent Judgment
1. This is appeal No. 10122 of 2004, which is against the council's refusal to issue a building certificate for unauthorised works on a dwelling at 12 Margaret Street, Fairlight.
2. This refusal was based on council's determination that three aspects of the building did not comply with the development consent and those three aspects are firstly the provision of an upstairs bedroom window and secondly the construction of a large family room window on the lower floor and thirdly the construction of an extra leaf in the terrace doors. I note that there has been a previous s 96 appeal hearing on this matter and that was dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate